Another copyright infringement story

The other week I was trawling the internet as I usually do, researching a future blog post, when I stumbled upon a very familiar looking photo on Wikipedia.

Copyright infringing photo on Wikimedia Commons - 'Hitachi at Richmond station'

There was a good reason for that photo being familiar – I took it at Richmond station back on October 13, 2005.

Tail end of a Hitachi at Richmond Station

Over the past few years I’ve uploaded hundreds of my photos to Wikipedia – over 500 at last count – but the photo I found had been uploaded by someone else.

Incorrect date and false declaration of 'own work' on Wikimedia Commons

If pinching my photo isn’t enough, the thief had also gotten the date taken completely wrong – by October 2013 the remaining Hitachi fleet had all been stripped of the green and old ‘PTC’ livery when they received a minor refurbishment in 2007, followed by a Metro Trains sticker job in 2009.

Hitachi 275M and Siemens 705M stabled for the weekend at North Melbourne Sidings

Rather than clean up the mess of copyright infringement, the simplest way to fix it was a deletion request – just navigate through the byzantine speedy deletion request page and it is deleted!

Copyright infringing image deleted on Wikimedia Commons

Footnote

The bureaucratic processes of Wikipedia have been flagged as the biggest risks to the growth of the free encyclopaedia – both Slate and MIT Technology Review have written on the topic.

Liked it? Take a second to support Marcus Wong on Patreon!
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Responses to “Another copyright infringement story”

  1. Beren Scott says:

    This is a big problem across the entire internet, not just wikipedia. People no longer care about who owns a picture. The correct action of the user would be to contact the owner of the picture and request authority to use the picture on wikipedia. And I’ll bet you’d probably have given that authority if some link or credit were given back to you.

    Hey, the internet is full of click bait with stolen stuff. Stealing content is free, making content takes time and energy.

  2. Andrew S says:

    Ironically one of my photos made it to Wikipedia via a request which I am otherwise happy to give. Another ended up on the front of the Dandenong Journal without request which also looked surprisingly familiar with the bottom bit blurred out slightly to remove the obvious arrangement of the cars – admittedly they do that with all their images at the top for headlines.

    • Marcus Wong says:

      I’ve been known to ask people for permission to use their photo on Wikipedia, and most of the time people are more than happy to.

      People also address the same requests to me, but I skip the middle man and upload the photo to Wikipedia so they don’t have to. 😛

  3. Andrew says:

    I see blog mates plastering their photos with their monikers. I don’t even know how to do it. People are so precious about their photos. As far as I know, no one has ever used a photo of mine without a request. Perhaps that says something about my photographic skills. But if they have used a photo of mine and not credited it, it could be that is was directly linked and they don’t actually know. If they have used as photo of mine as their own or without saying it wasn’t theirs, then that is wrong. I’ve used Wikipedia photos without a credit to who knows who took the photo. Wikipedia does not make it clear, more often than not. Clearly there is a an issue with Wikepedia and credits to photographers.

Leave a Reply